0:00 The idea like even just that one fact alone that he added terrorism for his insurance on the building >> right off. Yes. >> Was it weeks before? >> Yeah. That's [snorts] crazy. >> Welcome back to another episode of Careful Boys. Today we are going to discuss without joking what do you really think happened with 9/11? >> For real. For real. >> For real. For real. What what are your individual >> airline stocks say at all? People sold ahead of just ahead barely ahead of what happened on the on the day and then oh what do you know the airlines go down and then all these cats who shorted the airlines made s████████ of money. How do they know that? >> And then the guy that owns the buildings right >> yeah put insurance
0:50 >> he just got it within two weeks of the of the >> and he shows up to the office every single day and then just that day he doesn't go. He did. >> He had a dentist appointment or something. >> Yeah, that's not >> But he put insurance specifically >> and his son. Wasn't his son supposed to be there, too? Or something like that? >> I don't remember. >> Something weird like that. Yeah. And the terrorism insurance he added on last minute. >> How would you know? >> So, who do you think's behind that? >> Uh, I think that that there are enough there's so much money worldwide that we don't even know about. Like, there's there's a there's so much money, by the way, that just gets traded every day that we don't even think about that I think had way more to do with this than we than we know. What do you think about the uh the the art team that was there prior and about how they could have been planting explosives on the floors? Do you believe that there was actual explosions or that
1:40 everything truly did implode? That that's actually the thing that I'm most a believer in because everything else is like so difficult for a normal peon American or human to comprehend if you're not in the upper elite, right? Like the idea of like uh the owner of the building putting in insurance in order to get a payoff, that's manageably understandable. The uh let's go into war in order to make sure that we can get oil or like these uh weapons manufacturers get paid or that we can go do this in order to topple this regime and blah blah blah. That stuff is so beyond me. I I'm way too ████ ant uh to understand >> all root for war is is >> But that's that's the thing though. That's what I'm saying. the scop stuff, the the the the things that are beyond like millions of people believing in something. I I'm never going to speak on
2:30 understanding that I believe or understand that grand of a thing. But was it demolition? I can get behind that. I can get behind that conspiracy and and and all the information documentaries >> in general. all the random details from the different people who who have no invested interest in like the success of terrorism in America saying what they said. Like I do believe genuinely that it was demolition. >> I have to say I do think George W. Bush was the perfect president to have during this because everyone thought he was a ████ >> Yeah. >> And >> there's no way he could have done it. >> And if it was Al Gore, people would have been like he's so much more thoughtful. Like I don't know if I buy that he wasn't involved in some way. but instead George W was just came off as a ████ and so people are just like there's no way he's aware or whatever.
3:20 >> What do you think about um the the planes themselves? Do you think there were actually people in there that they just allowed to die or do you think they did something else with them? >> I think it's very possible that they knew that the terrorists were planning and doing this and they were allowing it. But also, I think that they could be they could have encouraged it cuz that's another thing about the military where what they do is they'll encourage the opposition to act on stuff so it gives them a reason to back uh re attack it >> and then oh the doors unlocked that day. You're welcome. Like everything goes your way. >> What about who do you think those Israelis were that they caught dancing and celebrating on top of the truck when they were watching the buildings? >> That's crazy. that I just don't find that relevant for some reason >> cuz then they ended up being like actual msad, didn't they? They ended up being spies or
4:10 >> I don't know what what I do >> and then they just like sent them back. >> To to your previous question about that is is the idea of like moral gymnastics, right? Like we do it every day in our smaller capacity as people. We we go like, "Yeah, I'll let myself do this. I'll eat this dessert in order to blah blah blah because yada." Like we do moral gymnastics every day. We we don't think that the ████ giant government who governs over 300 million people is willing to sacrifice a total of like 3,000 lives or whatever >> yet to give us a reason to invade a country >> to spend billions. >> I think that's like a really lowcost sacrifice concept and they line the pockets of ex we can we can track that money like they literally line the pockets of like >> Hallebertton right Blackwater all those kind >> that's not even moral gymnastics that's like moral warm-up maybe. >> What about the um what happened at the Pentagon do you think? You know how like
5:00 there's just no no HD footage and no true evidence. >> I think that they actually just launched missiles at the Pentagon. >> That's one of the main theories because that's what it looks like. >> Yeah. It's just a small little hole. >> Yeah. And >> well, the Hulk is is excusable cuz cuz a fuselage of an of an airplane could act the same way, right? But they also like had engines that were recovered from the site. But I I just think that it makes sense when you think of it that they they just actually did what they did. So like they used planes as missiles. I think that whole day. So I think that they actually attacked the Pentagon with a plane as a missile. >> Oh, okay. You mean they had a missile in the plane? >> No, no, no. The plane was the missile. >> Oh, got it. Got it. >> But but what I'm saying is I think that it was all part of the same thing of like let's
5:50 scare the ████ out of everybody. Oh, well, there there was one theory though about the Pentagon and they're like the room was cleared and all that, but it just so happened to have like all the auditing files. >> True. >> Cuz they were being audited for like um like a trillion dollars was missing in the Pentagon or something >> in the Department of Defense budget. >> Yeah. And then there was something about like oh that specific area that got targeted. Oh well, you know, the files were there and they're burnt up now. Or like there's all kinds of ████ like that. >> Kind of like a building seven. >> Yeah. Yeah. So the the I guess the truth about building 7 that they that they say is that the spire from the tower like basically sliced it on one side causing the whole thing to collapse. >> If you look at the foundation, it definitely got messed with by the collapse of the of WTC, right? But the crazy part of it is the fires. The fires
6:40 were on the whole side of the building. People haven't a lot of people who talk about WT7 don't talk about the fires. The fires were insane on one side of the building, but that doesn't mean that you again >> before it fell. The before the tower fell. Exactly. Right. >> That's weird. Before the tower fell. >> Yes. And you can There's pictures of it because they had so many helicopters flying around. But the crazy thing is that it collapsed the way it collapsed. That's what sus to me. >> There's two Well, go ahead. >> No, no. It it collapsed like like a like they did a building demolition and it fell into its own footprint in the same way that you would do a building demolition. That's crazy to me. If these fires were burning, that has to be a more uneven thing, right? It can't be completely uniform in the way that it collapsed. >> Yeah. >> So, that blew my mind. >> So, to your point, there's a compilation of demolition experts that all say the
7:32 same things. They there's two there's two big things of main reasons why I believe it's a demolition is because one, trust the experts. I don't ████ know, but it looks like one. When I saw the ████ recent one right here when they're doing the A's building, you know, like the Tropicana was it it's it's controlled, right? He goes, "The foundation has to be and it has to go upwards." >> The other main thing was there were a lot of firefighters reporting saying it sounds like bombs are going off. >> Many of them were in the building and saying there's bombs going off. So, it's like they were trapped in basic I think they were murdered and killed because of the demolition going on. Also, Larry Silverstein, if you remember, this is all on the radio at the time. He says, "We're going to pull it." Talking about WTC7. He says, "We're going to pull it," which is the the term that they used for we're going to demo the building. So,
8:23 like the idea is that he supervised and okayed it and just thought it was like how they were doing it that day and then cleaned up his language afterward, saying like, "Oh, I didn't mean like that. I meant like this." The idea like even just that one fact alone that he added terrorism >> for his insurance on the building >> right off. Yes. >> Was it weeks before? >> Yeah. That's crazy. Like >> just [laughter] that by itself common knowledge and life experience, right? Your siblings building some fort or tower and then you go over and you ████ karate chop sidekick the ████ out of it. It never perfectly demolishes. And even if it did, that's a one in a million chance. Let's say three buildings all fully perfectly demolished >> with gravity straight down. >> Yeah. >> And that that's number one crazy. And
9:13 then number two, you think about the idea of like uh let's go with the foundational conspiracy about like the new world order, right? The the the the one thread of a concept where it's like, hey, if we introduce a greater threat to humanity to like um aliens, >> Yeah. >> then we would all band together because we had a common greater threat, right? So it's like what would we do on a microcosm? What would we do at a smaller scale? Wouldn't you think that they would test it within their own? >> Yeah. >> Who do you think the puppet masters are and who do you think really benefited from this whole thing? >> I think I think it would be very difficult to say if um we were just watching that moment which is a very emotionally pulling moment. And then if you in hindsight 2020 look back and then you see things like the Patriot Act, it's convincing a little bit, right? If you see, like he said, experts on demolition talk about it, it gets more
10:04 convincing. If you talk about what we actually did in the Middle East and for what other reasons outside of like the war on terrorism, it adds to the convincing argument. That's all it is. I'm not saying any one thing is very uh discernably like black and white clear >> leadership. We started growing drugs in their >> Yeah. Big pharma benefited from Afghanistan. >> Thank you. And then um well I >> we group I think the military-industrial complex meaning everyone that benefits from the the war from arms trade you know all the missiles being bought also like um even like um construction which is Hallebertton they made a lot of money which was Dick Cheny's company and a lot of people say Dick Cheney was the architect of everything but it's also deeper than this because uh George Bush senior is was a director of the CIA
10:54 And they're like saying that the first initial attempt was Iraq 1.0, right? Cuz it was called Desert Storm. They uh when they were into Kuwait, they they went they went they were trying to save all their oil there, all that. So they've been trying to go in there. Saddam kind of like >> he be he kind of slipped up like he was at a vulnerable point. He wasn't staying on top of his military, all this ████ So at this point they're like this is a good time to strike. But they needed a reason to go in. So, there's several layers like of course banking like they're going to lend the money. Um, a lot of people profit off of war and that's why they call it the military-industrial complex. So, I don't think it's one group. I just think that we've been doing this but we're waking up to it. So, rewind back to more instances of us doing these false flag self attacks, right? Or allowing it to
11:44 happen. Pearl Harbor is a big one. So, so, so to explain to the people outside, America knew about per Pearl Harbor before it happened and they could have prevented it. >> No, in the movies. >> No, but they were told multiple times and they were given letters and all that stuff. This is already a historical fact, but they didn't act upon it. And they also moved a lot of the um functioning newer like battleships the night before and they left the older ones in the bay that they're like, "You could blow these up. I don't care. Another one is the start of Vietnam. Gulf of Tonka. So it >> Gul of Tonka. >> It was I think we attacked ourselves or some ████ and then we said that Vietnamese the Vietkong attacked us. >> It's like the rice tag fire that the Nazis did, right? Where they go, "Oh ████ they they burned our building. We have to attack the this these people."
12:36 It's the same idea. You rile everyone up and then you get them focused on your cause. >> Mhm. I guess what I'm trying to get at or not [clears throat] get at but fig try to figure out is um so you know like if there's a street fight or like let's say there's a Dodger game yes there's people they go sell hot dogs people make money off the hot dogs make money off the merch right and I think that's what the Hallebertton is like things there there's certain things are after the fact and [snorts] then there's people that are planning beforehand like who do you guys think are planning beforehand or do you think like >> the Patriot Act was huge I think the Patriot act was huge in that era. >> But do you think that's after the fact like oh now we have this now we can sneak this. >> Let me give you a name. >> I person if I want to be conspiracist I think it was preemptive because we were also at that particular moment entering the technological boom and era of internet and communications. So I think
13:26 like the US government getting ahead of it, ahead of its citizens and making sure they had control and or the ability by sentiment not just ability rights the sentiment of allowing people to like pay attention to monitor name. I think it's so much more interesting to talk about names instead of ideas. So Paul Bremer, we we charged him with being in charge of Iraq and he basically is the guy who granted China the oil contracts and he ran Iraq for like years before we turned it over to the population, whatever the ████ that means. We're still obviously loosely in charge of Iraq, but Paul Bremer has never been really deeply interviewed ever. Like I've never seen a 2-hour interview with Paul Bremer after the fact. I would love to see this cat actually have to account for what the ████ happened, right? Like people like
14:18 Scott Ritterder, he was the UN's UN weapons inspector um when we were in the buildup to the Iraq war. He was the cat who was on TV who was getting ridiculed at the time by everybody, Democrats, Republicans, everybody. And and he was saying the same thing. Saddam does not have the weapons. I am the UN weapons inspector. Saddam doesn't have ████ He He has been compliant in a sense, but we know what he has and what he doesn't have. He doesn't have what they're saying he has, which is they're saying he had had nuclear weapons. He doesn't have it. So Scott weapons of mass destruction >> and Scott Ritter got written off by everybody. I'm talking about CBS, NBC, Fox News, MSNBC. It was a uniform public opinion. >> So what were they saying about him? That he's just >> that he's a liar. He's lying. He >> was lying. >> Yes. Because we obviously have intelligence. Colin Pal, he sat, he was
15:09 the secretary of state at the time. He sat in front of the Senate Intelligence Committee and he says, "Oh yeah, we have all these photos and Iraq definitely has weapons, I think." Right. And and that was enough. And so we got drugged into this war. There was 90 what ████ seven votes or something for it. Nobody voted against it except for like two people. And but but nobody's had to account for Paul Bremer who was in charge of Iraq. and and nobody's ever had Scott Ritter on to talk to him like to actually get the story of this buildup.
// end of tape