← back to the archive // episode file

Trump is Suing BBC for $1 Billion

#cancerousmaterials#bbc#realnews#trump#january
the transcript auto-captions · entered into evidence

0:05 Welcome back to another spicy episode of the Careful Boys, where the question is, why is Trump suing the BBC for or threatening to $1 billion? >> 1 billion. >> I think this white guy knows, >> huh? I was just stretching my arm. I have no idea. I have no clue. >> Spread the news. Do we do news here? >> Didn't he sue a bunch of other news? >> Yes. >> CBS. He sued 60 Minutes. Yeah, they were like editing some stuff >> cuz there was a very blatant they were able to actually pinpoint what was edited and how and it made it sound like the speech he was giving was in fact inciting the January 6 riot. >> Indeed. But but what you're talking about he sued 60 Minutes because they doctorred um a Kamla interview. >> Oh that's right. >> Exactly. And they made her sound more coherent. >> Yeah. And then they forced her to show

0:55 the whole clip and then they just took different things. The whole clip is like gobbledegook ████ It's really bad. Yeah. >> So that's like the kind of what's going on. He's also sued other outlets as well and settled out of court. So like it's kind of what he's been doing. >> Okay. We'll watch this clip real quick. >> Billion dollars of lawsuit. Jesus. >> Well, that's what you do, right? You go you go big and then they settle. >> Let's watch this clip. Make sure my volume's on. Check. >> I'll be there with you and we fight. We fight like hell. We're gonna walk down to the capital >> AND WE'RE GONNA CHEER ON >> WOW. >> our brave senators and >> completely def Wow. >> Wow. That's crazy. >> And then and then there's like a

1:45 40minute gap of his of his speech and then it goes to the clip of and we fight like hell. >> 40 minutes, bro. >> Wow. That's ins it's actually a different So he gave two speeches that day, right? So they they cut to a different speech completely and a different moment of a different speech. >> So it's totally slander. >> Completely different message. Yeah, >> I'd sue too. That's ████ crazy. >> Not to mention, as we featured on JK before, which I'm sure a lot of people got pissed off about, but I don't give a ████ >> He also said peacefully and patriotically, you know, let them hear your voice, right? And like that was omitted from almost every news broadcast that I've ever seen about January 6th. I mean, I know I know all the opinions on on this dude are locked in. Not trying to change anyone's mind on anything here, but focusing on the lawsuit part, six how much? Six a bill.

2:35 >> A billion. >> Is that the biggest one so far that he's done against the media? >> I don't know. But but my my my take is no matter if you like Trump or not, the truth is the truth. You should just see what he actually said. Like that's the whole thing. Like >> Yeah. My my take is on the uh like altering of the truth and the actual footage regardless of who's speaking because that's just dangerous. >> Yeah. If it was Obama, I'd be just as pissed. >> You could take your favorite guy and ████ them up in your own brain or they could take the guy that you hate and ████ them up in your own brain >> and then now it's they're controlling the narrative and then now there's someone that's has a a >> like a bottle or a firewall behind the truth and you and that part's scary. Exactly. And they think it's it's up to them to filter this news for you because you're too stupid to make the right decision. >> Well, then that got you cited as a

3:26 source for like all the accusations of him inciting the riot. >> If I saw that first clip, I [clears throat] would if and that's the only thing I saw. >> I would have thought that he was trying to rally up everybody on January 6th to go ████ do the insurrection. I would have believed it. >> So, I don't blame the people that saw that and believed that that's what Trump did. But that's where Trump, it makes sense why he's suing him because it's like, dude, because of you, now everyone thinks that I started the insurrection. >> And literally in like a 20 minutes ago update, the BBC has apologized to Donald Trump, admitting it made an error of judgment in broadcasting a panorama episode with an edited speech by the American leader, but refused his request for compensation. It said it would not broadcast the episode in any form again and that chairman Samir Shaw has sent a personal letter to the White House to apologize for the editing of the speech.

4:17 Spokesperson said, "While the BBC sincerely regrets the manner in which the video clip was edited, we strongly disagree there is a basis for a defamation claim >> and the the damage was done." Like so the problem is that like all redaction claims when when news media comes out and says like we we got this wrong which happens all the time they never get as many hits as the sensationalist headline thing ever. So that's the issue for me personally is not everyone will be exposed to that truth. I know that already cuz hell of people online >> constantly talk about this situation and say Trump made everyone walk into the capital. I'm like bro you >> and I'm still mad about how people think when you eat courage you get better eyes. >> It's all ████ They redacted that bullit that ████ They told >> See, you believe that? >> They ████ redacted that ████ ages ago, but people don't ████ know. >> Remember how they said cholesterol comes from like eggs? Don't eat too many eggs and don't eat red meat.

5:07 >> Yolk, the yolk specifically is good for you. Oops. >> It's ████ really good, actually. >> Where's that lost? >> I can't wait till they redact the cancerous materials in Flaming Hot Cheetos. >> I can't wait till they redact the the cancerous materials in your apartment building. Like, warning, your apartment building has cancerous materials. Just walk into your car like, "Oh s███." Don't people still believe that flavored hot Cheetos were invented by that that Mexican guy? Is he not? Was he Mexican? >> No. Mexican jander guy. >> Dude, all my s███'s ████ up. [laughter] I'm suing everybody, dude. I don't know. ████ Everything's And man take out his own rib to suck his own dick. >> No, he did that. >> Richard [laughter] Gear. >> My buddy in third grade said he did that. >> Damn. It's not It's not that Hispanic. I thought they're going to make a movie about it or >> they did. They made it. It's complete ████ ████ ████ [laughter] Richard Gear shoved a hamster up his ass,

5:57 >> dude. That's probably the most unfortunate one. Like, what did he ever do to >> What did Richard Gear do to anybody, man? >> I don't know. But whatever he did, it came back and hit him hard. >> I think um there's a there's an interesting conversation idea that BBC is technically a UK company, >> right? >> Yeah. So then you have to like follow the money in a sense and think about like what an incentive for like a non US company to like involve themselves in a certain way where it's it's willing to report the news in a certain bias. >> Yeah, that's true. Cuz they hate Trump over there because of the media, right? But they loved Obama. >> Yeah. >> Well, it also depends on what are they leftaning or right leaning? >> We know they're left leaning. >> Well, I don't know. Well, now Yeah. Now they're left, but then there was a minute where they were kind of right. >> Well, they've always been jingoistic, if

6:47 you like that term, right? Like they've always been like pro war, like Iraq war. They were selling the same lines we're selling over here. >> Well, cuz Tony Blair at the time was >> riding with us. >> But I don't know if the that was the sentiment of the people. >> I have no idea. >> Who knows what the people really, man? >> That was like they were selling and and people were buying enough where there wasn't uprisings over there during it. So, >> but politically they're more left than we are. Like they even have um socialist and communist parties like in their open well they're the ones arresting people for freaking tweets and >> that's crazy >> like talking crap and comments but I was speaking specifically of BBC and so if they if BBC >> if there's a right or leftwing >> they are then it makes sense why they would be in line just kind of like you know during co there's that one where they show one person with one talking point about why you got to get the vaccine and then they show news anchors

7:37 from Pakistan wherever ████ Asia, Indonesia it's like everyone had the same exact ████ topic. >> And then CNN made Joe Rogan green. >> Yeah. >> Oh my god. >> Which So again, if it's so bad, you don't have to sell people. It's already just bad. >> So like if what Trump said is so bad, you don't have to sell people. You don't have to edit things. You just leave it alone and like just let everyone see the truth. But like that's what's ████ up to me. >> Yeah. But I think those outlets are owned by [clears throat] some like it's all becoming conglomerates now, right? cuz like >> it might be um a British company but it might be owned the route might be owned by like Biacom or whatever like whatever >> like like there's that whole post of there's like three companies five companies that own all the media see the whole pyramid of like and then there's Australian news there's American there's like all kinds of ████ >> but like some people think that's a conspiracy theory which is nuts you can

8:27 literally just see it for yourself like it's they're all owned by like five companies >> I mean with his track record there's going to probably be some form of comp compensation some form of settlement won't be a billion dollars, but like Trump's going to get some XYZ millions amount of dollars and then he's also going to talk about it and he's going to be like, "Yeah, I I made this from them too because >> he just did that on 60 Minutes." He was like, "You guys just paid me a s███████ of money cuz like you guys messed up." >> You know what's a really interesting thing though is like how many times that we've heard the insurrection compared to the Holocaust, compared to 9/11. That means any all of those statements that have been circulating about it being that bad can technically be used as evidence for his damages. >> Yeah. For his defamation, right? >> To be like, this is what people compared it to. This thing that I >> Not to mention, which is also recent

9:18 information, there was hell of more FBI informants and agents on site on January 6th than >> Wait, didn't they just release that the bombs were planted by federal? that hasn't been confirmed yet, but that is that is another part of the story that hasn't been really addressed. Like they can forensically identify who set off an IED in Iraq by the fingerprint off of a bomb that got exploded into thousands of pieces, but they didn't know who the January 6th pipe bombers were, which was intact devices that were actually like real devices that could have exploded, but they didn't. And then now they're kind of getting to the bottom of that story. So I'm fascinated to find out what the hell happens there. Yeah, it's pretty fun. >> Yeah, that is pretty crazy. >> Yeah, you're right. If all these things are true, you don't need to ████ hamfist it. >> Yeah, >> that's always been my thing. Just tell people the real ████ That's what the

10:09 news was always supposed to be as far as my understanding. What's the deal? The deal is we tell the public what is and then you decide whatever you want from it, right? And I just think that that's promises been broken over and over again. >> During man, one of the uh presidencies like in the 90s or whatever, right? Uh, up until that point, every publication had to, if it was like news or whatever, you had to have at least 30% of your material showing the opposing side. >> That's called the fairness doctrine. >> It was so it used to be more fair. >> Yeah. >> Then whatever president that time, was it Reagan? Reagan. >> Yeah. A Republican, right? And he's like, "We don't need to do that ████ no more." And then it got passed. And then so now they can go as hard as they want to on just one side. Yeah. And that sort of started the spiral of opinion news,

10:59 >> which is what we see all the time now. We don't even see real news anymore. We just see opinion everywhere. Wall towall. >> Real news is here though. That's why we're there. It's >> on JK News, brother. Say that. >> This is the place where you get it. >> Real news and ball knowledge, dog. I'll tell you that. Mhm. >> I'll talk about the ball sacks. You could talk about the basketball. >> Cool, man. That's sick. >> Sick. [laughter]

// end of tape